RESPond® FGC Technology

SO3 can negatively impact the effectiveness of activated carbon for mercury control. RESPond® Flue gas Conditioning Technology has the same ESP treatment benefits of SO3 injection, but also enhances effective mercury control. This technology is a critical component to MATS compliance.

ADA’s Flue Gas Conditioning Technology:

RESPond FGC Technology is an alternative to more traditional SO3 Injection for Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) performance, Particulate Matter (PM) and opacity control. It works by reducing the electrical resistivity of the collected particulate resulting in reduced PM emissions and opacity. Our technology provides key advantages over SO3 injection for mercury control.

ADAAdditiveInjectionSystem
  • Improves the collection efficiency of ESPs
  • Enhances Particulate Matter (PM) and opacity control
  • Does not interfere with Activated Carbon for mercury control
  • Reduces sorbent usage for ACI System
  • Allows boilers to burn a wider variety of coals

Product and Services Offering

Specialty Chemicals

The RESPond Additives are an alternative to SO3:

  • Reduces fly ash resistivity for lower sulfur coals or with use of lime based DSI injection
  • Allows boilers to burn a wider variety of coals
  • Improves ESP power levels, reduces spark rates and reduces opacity
  • Improves fly ash cohesivity to reduce PM re-entrainment
  • Unlike SO3 does not interfere with ACI mercury capture technology
  • Reduces amount of activated carbon used for mercury control
  • No impact on fly ash sales
  • Effective up to 400°F
  • Can be used intermittently or full-time

Injection Equipment

The RESPond FGC is injected as a finely atomized spray into the flue gas or industrial off-gas, upstream of the ESP. The RESPond Injection Equipment evenly distributes the additives across the entire flue gas stream. Other key features include:

  • Simple skid based design
  • Low capital and installation costs
  • Simple operation and adjustments
  • Low maintenance
  • Low power & water usage
  • Integrated with plant’s control system
  • Quick start-up- no long warm up required

RESPond FGC vs. SO3 FGC

  • SO3 impacts the effectiveness of activated carbon for mercury control : ADA’s FGC does not
    • Regulatory compliance will be a challenge for plants using SO3 to improve particulate capture in their ESPs
    • Sorbent usage and cost will be significantly higher when SO3 is in use